RIP Questions

Question 4

I think answer C is incorrect. To enable RIP we should be in global configuration mode .

Enabling RIP

To enable RIP, use the following commands beginning in global configuration mode:

abc> enable //User EXEC Mode > Privileged EXEC Mode
abc# configure terminal //Privileged EXEC Mode > Global Configuration Mode
abc(config)#router rip //Enables a RIP routing process, which places you in router
configuration mode. After RIP is enabled :
abc(config-router)# network {network IP address} // Associates a network with a RIP
routing process
In my oppinion answer B is the correct .
We have a question to enable RIP , not to configure it.

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/12_2/configfun/configuration/guide/ffun_c/fcf019.html

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/12_2/ip/configuration/guide/fipr_c/1cfrip.html#wp1000952

RIP Questions
Question 4

I think answer C is incorrect. To enable RIP we should be in global configuration mode .

Enabling RIP

To enable RIP, use the following commands beginning in global configuration mode:

abc> enable //User EXEC Mode > Privileged EXEC Mode

To enter global configuration mode, use the
configure terminal in privileged EXEC command

abc# configure terminal //Privileged EXEC Mode > Global Configuration Mode
abc(config)#router rip //Enables a RIP routing process, which places you in router
configuration mode. After RIP is enabled :
abc(config-router)# network {network IP address} // Associates a network with a RIP
routing process
In my oppinion answer B is the correct one.
We have a question to enable RIP , not to configure it.

Engineer has to enable RIP on a link. Where he will issue the command?
A. IPv6
B. Global
C. Router sub command
D. Interface sub command

what is the correct answer for this?

@Kili

If the question was to just “enable rip” this would be global.
but if it is specifying “on an interface” then C is correct.
It is testing whether you know that rip cannot be enabled under interface configuration, and is instead enabled by the “network” command under router config mode.

So which one is actually correct for Q4?? B or C???

Q4, Answers is C. Using the Cisco IOS, the command to enable RIP routing protocol is router rip.

please i need the question

Q4. C is correct as stated by Urumiko. Enabling RIP alone does not enable it on a link.

I was having doubts about Q1, but after testing it in UNL, I guess that A and C are correct.

501Qs
“please get the new real questions for CCNP route 300-101”
At below link:
Real valid questions, we 3 friends passed it.

Copy Below Link:

docs.google.com/document/d/1oVSLbsZ0nuxaw5tZJjKYjRPR_m0k9jsa23ZqrECLIb8/edit?usp=sharing

Anyone can explain why answer D of Q1 is not Correct ????

@Lebah, I can’t remember exactly, but I think a route will be removed after expiring a hold time + flash timer, NOT just hold timer. Thereby, a route will be removed after 240 sec, but not 180.

@Marcus,

Exactly, you are right. After the 180s of the Holdtime, it still wait 60s more (flush time) before deleting this route.
Thank you.

According to Chris Bryant’s book, RIP is no longer on the Route exam.

They still mention RIP in a question or two. No config tho

anyone can say where is questions?

how can i get questions

Q1 correct answers are A and D.
C is not correct because split horizon will not allow to send an announcement about net 192.168.2.0/27 to R2 (this network was reachable through R2 for R1).

Rothgar: Cisco 300-101 blueprint
“3.16 Configure and verify RIPv2
3.17 Describe RIPng”
Dmitry you forgot about “split horizon with poison reverse”
A means “route poisoning”
C means “poisoned reverse”
How has other opinion is free to try on GNS3 configuration from picture.

A few minutes ago I checked Q1 in Packet Tracer.
So, I saw packet with a hop count of 16 from R2 to R1, but I didn’t see the same packet from R1 to R2.
Maybe I did something wrong… Could someone check it to?

Dmitry, In GNS3 is ok i saw messages for A and C
But, you have right in terms of Cisco implementation. The situation is tricky.
In RIP implementation defined in RFC is written very cleary about split horizon and poison reverse.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1058
BUT, CISCO implementation has default split-horizon ENABLE and poisoned reverse DISABLED.
In most of the Cisco routers you cannot activate poison reverse in case of RIP
I find “ip rip poison-reverse” only in 5.0 XR version.
So,even if i obtain good results in GNS3 my answer regarding C is not 100% trustful
Let’s examine trustful percentage of D answer
“D. After communication fails and after the hold-down timer expires, R1 will remove the 192.168.2.0/27 route from its routing table.”
First idea.When communication between R2 and R3 fails, R2 will send network 192.168.2.0/27 and metric 16 (answer A). When R1 receives a route for 192.168.2.0/27 with metric 16, consider that route is unreacheable and the router will remove that route from the routing table, and send a poison reverse to the router that sent the route poison.
So will not wait till hold-down timers expires.
Second idea.
According with Cisco theory, hold-down time is 180 seconds and represent time when route become inactive.
flush time is 240 seconds and is the time when route is erased from memory and that definition is 100% truth. So, after flush timer expires, R1 will remove the 192.168.2.0/27 route from its routing table
That means answer D is not correct one
Agree with me. Dmitry?
Thanks for your opinion. It helps me to document more to find arguments to sustain my option.

C is correct => router sub command, because configuration should be put at “router rip” configuration. It is not global please remember.

Rip is CONFIGURED under the global ipv6 router rip…

RIP is ENABLED under interface, for god sakes, it even says: Ipv6 rip “NAME OF RIP” ENABLE

I think the misconception here is the wording used.

@ suntzu you are talking about RIPng, the question mentions RIP

who needs updated dump for ROUTE 300-101 can contact me at: cisco4career @ gmail . com
Good luck guys!